|
1.
Brief Account of Events Said to Have Occurred
2. Primary Sources
2.1.
Josephus, Antiquities 14.1.2-7.3; 4-122
2.2.
Josephus, War 1.6.1-8.9; 120-82
3. More Detailed Account of Events Said to Have Occurred
with Citation of Sources
4. Questions

1.
Brief Account of Events Said to Have Occurred
Jewish and Roman histories
begin to intersect at this point, so that one cannot discuss Jewish
history without discussing Roman history (the reverse is not as
true, of course). When Salome died in 67 BCE, there arose a conflict
between Hyrcanus II and his brother Aristobolus II over who would
succeed their mother as both High Priest and king; these two were
leaders of de facto poltical parties compete with militias
within the Jewish state. Aristobolus II declared war on Hyrcanus II,
and in a decisive battle many of the soldiers supporting Hyrcanus II
deserted to Aristobolus II. Hyrcanus II agreed that his brother Aristobolus
II would be High Priest and king. But the matter did not end there.
Antipater, an Idumean who was appointed governor of Idumea by Alexander
Jannaeus, took up the cause of Hyrcanus II and with the military
support of the Nabatean king Aretas—who had lost much territory
to the Jews—marched to Jerusalem, laid siege to the city and
demanded that Hyrcanus II be reinstated as High Priest and be appointed
king.
Meanwhile, Pompey had
made his appearance in Asia, owing to rebellion by Mithridates VI
Eupator, the king of Pontus. Earlier, in 89 BCE, Mithridates
invaded parts of Asia massacring all the Roman inhabitants of the
province. (Asia became a province four years after the death
of Attalus III in 133 BCE, who willed his kingdom centered in Pergamum
to Rome; the Romans combined this territorial bequest with territory
taken from the Seleucid kingdom [Antiochus III in 189 BCE] to form
one administrative unity, the province of Asia.) In response, the
Roman senate sent the consul Lucius Cornelius Sulla with five legions
to fight against Mithridates; he defeated him, forced him to retreat
to his original position and imposed indemnity on him (First Mithridatic
War between 88-84 BCE). A second war was fought successfully
by the Romans from 83-82 BCE. A third war broke out when Nicomedes
III, the king of Bithynia (to the east of Pontus) bequeathed his
kingdom to Romans, who organized it into a province; Mithridates
VI Eupator, the king of Pontus, however, also coveted the territory,
and began a campaign to take control of the former kingdom of Bithynia.To
counter this threat, the Roman senate gave Pompey the authority
to attack Mithridates. Pompey defeated Mithridates in 66 BCE
(Third Mithridatic War 74-63 BCE). While in Asia, Pompey heard from
one of his generals, (Marcus Aemilius) Scaurus, who had been sent
to Syria, of the dispute going on in Jerusalem between Hyrcanus
II and Aristobolus II and their respective supporters. Scaurus began
to travel to Judea to capitalize on this crisis; hearing that the
Roman general on his way to Judea, both Aristobolus II and Hyrcanus
II sent emissaries to him to gain his support for their causes. This
was the beginning of the end of the Hasmonean dynasty and Jewish
independence.
In 65 BCE Scaurus temporarily
decided in favor of Aristobolus II, and ordered Aretas to withdrew,
which he did. In the meantime, Pompey conquered Syria, the last
of the Seleucid kingdom, and Syria was made into a Roman province
with a proconsul; the rest of the Seleucid kingdom by this time
had dissolved. In 63 BCE, Pompey met with Aristobolus II and Hyrcanus
II in Damascus to hear their respective cases for being appointed
king and High Priest. (A third delegation of Jews requested that
the monarchy be abolished, but Pompey did not take it too seriously.)
Pompey asked both to stay in Damascus and to wait on his decision.
Aristobolus II, however, left Damascus without Pompey's permission,
so that Pompey justifiably suspected Aristobolus II to be disloyal
to him and the Romans. So with his army he pursued Aristobolus II,
who eventually surrendered near Jericho. In the meantime, the people
of Jerusalem shut the gates of the city against Gabinius, the proconsul
of Syria, who had been sent to Jerusalem by Pompey to get money
that Aristobolus II had promised and to take possession of the city.
Pompey marched on the city, having taken Aristobolus II as a prisoner,
and the gates were opened to him by the followers of Hyrcanus II.
The supporters of Aristobolus II took refuge in the Temple mount
in the lower city. Pompey besieged the Temple, and within three
months broke through the walls and killed about 12,000 Jews. The
borders of the Jewish state were greatly reduced; what remained
was Judea, Idumea, Perea and Galilee
Pompey installed Hyrcanus
II as High Priest, but did not give him the title of king. He took
Aristobolus II and many Jewish prisoners of war to to Rome, where
they settled In 57 BCE, Alexander, the son of Aristobolus
II, who escaped from captivity on the way to Rome, attempted to
seize power, but was defeated by Gabinius, proconsul of Syria. In
57 BCE also, Hyrcanus II was stripped of all political power, and
Gabinius the proconsul of Syria divided the Jewish state into five
regions, each under his immediate control. This was the end of an
independent Jewish state. In 56-55 BCE, Aristobolus II and his son
Antigonus, who had escaped from Rome, tried in vain to take power
of the former Jewish state.
In
addition to the work of Nicolas of Damascus, Josephus frequently
quotes from and alludes to the Strabo's works. Strabo was
born in 64 or 63 BCE to a prominent family in Amasia the capital
of Pontus. His family had been allies of the Romans and Pompey
during the Third Mithridatic War. His first major work called
Historical Sketches, published in 20 BCE, in which
he narrated the history of the world known to him from the
time of Rome's conquest of Greece (the years 145-31 BCE),
has not survived, except in quotations in other works by Strabo
himself and other ancient authors. But Strabo's other major
work, a seventeen-volume work by known as Geographical
Descriptions (Geographica), written after 14 CE, has
survived largely in tact. In this work, he provides descriptions
of places and the history of the peoples who inhabited them,
including the Jews (Geog. 16.2). Josephus does not
identify on which of Strabo's works he is dependent for his
own work Antiquities, but by a process of elimination
it is clear that he is using Strabo's Historical Sketches.
|
2.
Primary Sources
2.1. Reading:
Josephus, Antiquities 14.1.2-7.3; 4-122
(Translated by W. Whiston)
2.2. Reading:
Josephus, War 1.6.1-8.9; 120-82
(Translated by W. Whiston)
| 
Gnaeus
Pompeius Magnus, born in 106 BCE, supported the victorious patrician
Cornelius Sulla in the civil war against the supporters of the
populist Gaius Marius (84-78 BCE). After re-conquering Spain,
Pompey returned to Italy to help M. Licinius Crassus end the
slave revolt led by the gladiator Spartacus (71 BCE). He was
then elected as consul of Rome in 70 BCE. Before he replaced
Lucullus as general in charge of waging war against Mithridates,
Pompey was assigned the task in ridding the Mediterranean of
pirates, which he succeeded in dong in 67 BCE.
|
| In an extremely
fragmentary text that appears to be a record of the proper rotation
of priests based on a six-year cycle, there are references to historical
events around the time of the appearance of the Romans in Palestine
(4Q322, 323, 324, 324a, 324b, 324c) (4Q324Calendrical Doc C-a-f).
Unfortunately, because these texts are so fragmentary, the events
referred to are unknown. What does remain are the names of important
Jewish historical figures from this time: "Shelamsiôn"
(šlmtzywn) = Salome Alexandra (4Q322 2.4; 4Q224b 1.2);
"Hyrcanos" (hrqnws) (4Q322 2.6) and "the High
Priest... Yochanan" (kwhn gdwl...ywchnn) (4Q224b
1.1) = John Hyrcanus I or John Hyrcanus II. In addition, the phrase
"Aemilius killed" (hrg 'mlyws) occurs, which
no doubt is a reference to the fact that Marcus Aemilius Scaurus
killed Jews either as a general under Pompey or a proconsul of Syria
(4Q324a 2.4, 8). |
3.
More Detailed Account of Events Said to Have Occurred with Citation
of Sources
(*=significant
apparent disagreement in sources)
|
Date
BCE |
Events
|
Sources
|
| 67 |
After his
mother Salome Alexandra's death, Aristobolus II, being the more
ambitious of the two brothers, declares war on his brother, Hyrcanus
II and his supporters who are defeated in battle near Jericho;
many of the soldiers of Hyrcanus II defect to his brother. No
doubt the Pharisees support Hyrcanus II in this conflict, whereas
the Sadducees support Aristobolus II. Hyrcanus II takes refuge
in the citadel (the Baris, later renamed the Antonia) where the
wife Aristobolus II and his children are being held (see Ant.
13.16.5; 426). Holding them as hostages, Hyrcanus II negotiates
an agreement with his brother that he would become a private citizen
and Aristobolus would become king and High Priest.
|
Ant.
14.1.2; 4-7; War 1.6.1; 120-22; see Ant. 14.3.2; 41;
14.6.1; 97; 20.10.4; 243-44
*Josephus gives the date in Olympian (third year of the 177 Olympiad)
and consular years, which would place the dates of Aristobolus'
victory over his brother in 69 BCE. |
| c. 67-65 |
An enemy of
Aristobolus II, Antipater, an Idumean who was appointed governor
of Idumea by Alexander Jannaeus, convinces Hyrcanus II that his life
is in danger as long as his brother is in power. Besides, he points
out that Aristobolus II is not the rightful heir to the throne, being
the younger brother. (His real motives are fear of Aristobolus II and
a desire to preserve his own political power.) Antipater advises
Hyrcanus II to flee to Aretas III, the Nabataean king at Petra, who
can protect him and make good on his claim to the throne. In
exchange for his support, Aretas III is promised the restoration
of twelve cities that were taken from the Nabataeans by Alexander
Jannaeus. |
Ant.
14.1.3-4; 8-18; War 1.6.2; 123-26
*Finding a political motive in this assertion, Josephus corrects
the statement of Nicolas of Damascus that Antipater's family were
Jews who had settled in Palestine from Babylon. |
| 66-65 |
The Third
Mithridatic War between Rome and the Mithridates VI Eupator, king
of Pontus, breaks out when Nicomedes III, the king of Bithynia (to
the east of Pontus) bequeathed his kingdom to Romans; Mithridates
plans to expand his own kingdom by the incorporation of Bithynia. To
counter this threat, the Roman senate gives Gaius Pompeius Magnus
(Pompey) the authority to attack Mithridates VI Eupator, the king
of Pontus. (Pompey replaces Lucullus.) Pompey defeats Mithridates
in 66 BCE (Third Mithridatic War 74-63 BCE), and also forces the
surrender of Tigranes, the Armenian king. Pompey makes Syria into
a Roman province at this time (Seleucid rule came to an end with
the invasion of Tigranes, who lost control of Syria to Lucullus.) |
Ant.
14.2.3; 29; War 1.6.2; 127; see Appian, Mithr. 97-119;
Diod. 37.53; Plutarch, Pomp. 32-39 |
| 65 |
With the backing
of Aretas, Hyrcanus II (and Antipater) defeat Aristobolus II, who
is then forced to retreat to Jerusalem, many of the supporters of
Aristobolus II defect to Hyrcanus II and he and his allies lay siege
to the city. A certain Onias (known as Choni in m. Ta'an.
3:8), known as a righteous man (who once successfully prayed for
rain) is asked is asked to put a curse on Aristobolus II and his supporters. He
refuses to take sides in the dispute between the brothers and is
stoned to death. The supporters of Hyrcanus II agree to sell Passover
lambs to the besieged in Jerusalem at an exorbitant price, but renege
on their agreement and keep the money already given to them for
the lambs. |
Ant.
14.2.1-2; 19-28
*Josephus confusingly provides two different reasons for divine
retribution in the form of the destruction of crops: the murder
of Onias (14.1.2; 25) and the violation of the oath to provide Passover
lambs (14.1.2; 28).
|
| 65 |
While at war
with Tigranes, Pompey sends (Marcus Aemilius) Scaurus, one of his
generals, to Damascus in Syria, where he discovers that Lollius
and Metellus have conquered the city. Hearing of the dispute going
on in Jerusalem between Hyrcanus II and Aristobolus II, Scaurus
begins to travel to Judea to capitalize on this internal crisis.
Both Hyrcanus II and Aristobolus II send delegations to him in an effort
to win his favor. Aristobolus II offers Scaurus a bribe of 400 talents
for his support, as does Hyrcanus II. Scaurus temporarily decides in
favor of Aristobolus II, because he believes that he is most able to
pay the promised sum and because the situation of Aristobolus II as
besieged is stronger, since Jerusalem is heavily fortified. Scaurus
orders Aretas to withdraw, which he does; Aristobolus II successfully
engages Aretas and Hyrcanus II in battle near Papyron, after Scaurus
has returned to Damascus. Phallion, the brother of Antipater, dies
in the conflict. |
Ant.
14.2.3; 29-33; War 1.6.3; 128-30 |
| 64-63 |
Pompey
arrives in Syria and winters in Aspis in 64; Antipater, representing
Hyrcanus II, and Nicodemus, on behalf of Aristobolus II, come
to visit Pompey in Aspis to present their respective cases. Nicodemus
accuses Scaurus and Gabinius of corruption, for it is alleged
that each took money from him, which is not good for his cause.
In the spring of 63, Pompey marches towards the region of Damascus,
forcing into submission those who still resist Roman rule and
destroying fortresses. Pompey sends for Aristobolus II and Hyrcanus II
to come to him and meet with him in Damascus. While in Pompey
is in Damascus, Aristobolus II sends him a golden vine or garden
worth 500 talents. Antipater
brings to Damascus more than a thousand men, called "notable
Jews," who are supporters of Hyrcanus II. At this time, Pompey
hears the petitions of Aristobolus II and Hyrcanus II. Hyrcanus II accuses
Aristobolus II of raids against neighboring peoples and being involved
in piracy, whereas Aristobolus II accuses Hyrcanus II of being unfit
for rule. Pompey also hears and dismisses a delegation of Jews
who do not want a king at all, but rule by the High Priest. Pompey
defers a judgment, asking the two brothers and their supporters
to keep the peace until he returns from a campaign against the
Nabateans. (Diodorus provides his readers with an account of the
Jews, which is based on the work of Hecataeus of Abdera, who wrote
a history of Egypt [Aegyptiaca] during the time of Ptolemy
I [40.3].) |
Ant.
14.3.1-3; 34-47; War 1.6.4; 131-3; see Diod. 40.2; Dio Cassius
37.7
*Josephus seems to have a duplicate accounts of Pompey's coming
to Damascus (Ant. 14.3.1; 34; Ant. 14.3.2; 38-40). |
| 63 |
Aristobolus
II does not comply with Pompey's directives; he leaves Damascus,
goes to Dium and then on to Judea. Instead of attacking the Nabataeans
as planned, Pompey pursues Aristobolus II. Aristobolus II and his
supporters take refuge in the fortress at Alexandreion. Pompey commands
Aristobolus II to surrender the fortress; Aristobolus II complies
and withdraws to Jerusalem, where he prepares for war against Pompey.
Pompey moves his army into Judea and encamps near Jericho. (At this
time, he receives the good news that Mithridates IV has died.) Aristobolus
II relents, and comes to Pompey as he is advancing on the city from
Jericho; he surrenders and promises Pompey money and free access
to Jerusalem. Pompey sends Gabinius to the city to collect on the
promises, but he is refused admittance. The soldiers of Aristobolus
II refuse to comply with the agreement made with Pompey, whereupon
Pompey places Aristobolus II under arrest. |
Ant.
14.3.3-4.1; 47-57; War 1.6.4-6; 132-40 |
| 63 |
Pompey advances
on Jerusalem, and is given admittance by the supporters of Hyrcanus II. The
supporters of Aristobolus II take refuge in the Temple. The Romans
lay siege to the Temple, attempting to break through the wall from
the north. After about three months the Romans and some Jews who
are supporters of Hyrcanus II, breach the wall and overpower those
who have taken refuge within the Temple. (The fact that the Jews
would not fight on the Sabbath makes it easier for the Romans to
build their siege ramp, for they worked unopposed one day per week.)
Priests at work in the Temple are slain, but those still alive continue
in their sacred duties. Pompey and some of his men enter the sanctuary
and look into the holy place and the holy of holies. Pompey, however,
takes nothing from the Temple, including money in the treasury. |
Ant.
14.4.1-4; 57-73; War 1.7.1-6; 141-53; Pss. Sol.
2, 8, 17; see Dio Cassius 37.16.1-4; Strabo, 16.2.40 (762-63);
Livy, Epit. 102; Appian, Syr. 50; Mithr.
106; Tacitus, Hist. 5.9
|
| 63 |
Pompey appoints
Hyrcanus II as High Priest, but gives him no royal title, and he
frees many cities in Coele-Syria and elsewhere from Jewish control
and annexed them to the new Roman province of Syria. Pompey
executes those responsible for the war, and he imposes tribute on
the Jews. Scaurus is appointed governor (proconsul) of the Roman
province of Syria, and Hyrcanus II as ruler of Judea (prostasia
tou ethnou) is to be responsible to him (Ant. 20.10.4;
244. Aristobolus II and his children as taken as prisoners by Pompey
to Cilicia and then to Rome. One son, Alexander, escaped while
being transported to Rome. (Appian records that Aristobolus II is part
of a contingent of prisoners of war and hostages who march before
Pompey's chariot in a triumphal procession in Rome in 61 BCE [Mithr.
117; see Plutarch, Pompey, 45]; Appian wrongly says that
Pompey has Aristobolus II executed afterwards.) Josephus includes a
censurious remark about Hyrcanus II and Aristobolus II' responsibility
for the loss of Jewish independence (Ant. 4.4.5; 77-78). |
Ant.
14.4.4-5; 74-79; War 1.7.6-7.7; 153-58; see Appian, Syr.
51 |
| 62 |
Scaurus wages
war against Aretas in Petra, and requires that Hyrcanus II
and Antipater send food to the army when the Romans run short of
provisions. Antipater negotiates terms with Aretas, 300 talents
in exchange for the cessation of hostilities. |
Ant.
14.5.1; 80-81; War 1.8.1; 159 |
| 57 |
Alexander,
son of Aristobolus II, who has escaped from Roman custody, returns
to Judea, gathers an army and attempts to usurp power from the Roman-supported
Hyrcanus II. Gabinius, then proconsul of Syria, responds by sending
Marcus Antonius with a division of the army followed by the main
army; the Romans are supported by Jewish soldiers allied with Hyrcanus II
and Antipater. Alexander is defeated in battle, and takes refuge
in the fortress of Alexandreion. Gabinius tours the country with
part of his army, restoring order and rebuilding cities devastated
in the conflict; eventually he forces the surrender of Alexander
and the fortresses under his control, which Gabinius destroys. Gabinius
reorganizes politically the territory ruled by Hyrcanus II into five
administrative units (Jerusalem, Gazara, Amathus, Jericho, and Sepphoris)
under the control of councils (sunedria) consisting of local
aristocracies and responsible to him as proconsul of Syria. Hyrcanus
II is still High Priest with responsibility of the Temple. |
Ant.
14.5.2-4; 82-91; War 1.8.2-5; 160-70
*Josephus overlooks the fact that there were two governors between
Scaurus and Gabinius (Marcius Philippus and Lentulus Marcellinus).
*In Ant. and War, one of the capitals of the five
administrative units is said to be Gadara, but it should be Gazara. |
| 56 |
Aristobolus
II and his son Antigonus escape from Rome, and attempt another conquest
of Judea, but fail. Aristobolus II is taken back to Rome as a prisoner,
but his wife and children are allowed to stay in Judea. |
Ant.
14.6.1; 92-97; War 1.8.6; 171-74; see Dio Cassius, 39.56.6 |
| 55 |
While campaigning
against the Parthians, supplied by Hyrcanus II and Antipater, Gabinius
and his forces withdraw in order to reinstate Ptolemy XI Auletes
as king of Egypt. (Such an act is illegal for a proconsul,
according to Roman law, but Pompey has ordered him to do so, and
he has received a bribe from Ptolemy.) While in Egypt, Alexander,
son of Aristobolus II, makes another abortive attempt to seize power.
He and his army march through the country killing Romans. Gabinius
sends Antipater to convince the Jews to desist from their rebellion,
and largely succeeds. Alexander, however, with an army of 30,000
Jews does not, and is defeated by Gabinius near Mt. Tabor. |
Ant.
14.6.2-3; 98-102; War 1.8.7; 175-78; see Dio Cassius 29.56-58;
Cicero, In Pison. 48-50; Plutarch, Ant. 3; Appian,
Syr. 51 |
| 54-51 |
M. Lucinius
Crassus replaces Gabinius as proconsul of Syria. In order to pay
for a military campaign against the Parthians, he plunders the Temple
of 2,000 talents, and even strips the gold from the sanctuary,
worth 8,000 talents. Crassus' army is wiped out by the Parthians,
and he is killed. C. Cassius Longinus, the quaestor of Crassus,
assumes control in Syria. He repels the Parthians and in support
of Antipater suppresses an insurrection in Judea, led by a certain
Peitholaus, whom Cassius kills upon the advice of Antipater. (In
Ant. 14.7.2; 110-118, Josephus includes an account of the
Jews from Strabo.) Josephus provides some information about the
background of Antipater, an Idumean who married Cypros, a woman
from a distinguished Arab family. Antipater had four sons, Phasael,
Herod, Joseph and Pheroras, and a daughter, Salome (Ant.
14.7.3; 121-22). |
Ant.
14.7.1, 3; 105-109; 119-22; War 1.8.8-9; 179-82; see Dio
Cassius 40.28-29; Livy, Epit. 108; Justin 42.4; Cicero,
ad. Att. 5.20.1-7; ad. Fam. 2.10; Phil.
11.14/35 |
| 54 |
In connection
with Crassus' plundering of the Temple, Josephus explains that there
is so much wealth in the Temple because there are so many Jews and
"worshippers of God" (gentiles) who have been giving money
to the Temple. He then quotes Strabo twice to the effect that there
are many Jews who live outside of Palestine in various cites who
have disposable income. |
Ant.
14.7.2; 110-18 |
4.
Questions
4.1. Are there any indications
of the sources used in the two accounts of this period of Jewish history.
See Ant. 14.1.3; 9 ("Nicolas of Damascus says...");
14.3.1; 35-36 (Now Strabo of Cappadocia mentions this present in these
words..."; 14.4.3; 68 ("I appeal to those that have written
of the acts of Pompey; and, among them, to Strabo and Nicolaus [of Damascus];
and besides these two, Titus Livius, the writer of the Roman History,
who will bear witness to this thing"; 14.6.4; 104 ("Now Nicolas
of Damascus, and Strabo of Cappadocia, both describe the expeditions
of Pompey and Gabinius against the Jews"); 14.7.2; 110-18 ("but
there are many witnesses to it, and particularly Strabo of Cappadocia,
who says thus..." / "And Strabo himself bears witness to the
same thing in another place")?
4.2. Does Josephus' religious
biasesespecially his Pharisaic view of historyinfluence
his account of this period (see his interpretation of the siege
of Hyrcanus in Ant. 14.2.1-2; 19-28)? In particular, do you
agree with Josephus' ethical cause-effect interpretation of historical
events in his discussion of the death of Onias (Ant. 14.2.2;
25-28)? Should historical reconstruction be done in this manner?
4.3. Does Josephus' pro-Roman
bias influence his account of the loss of Jewish sovereignty: "Now
the occasions of this misery which came upon Jerusalem were Hyrcanus II
and Aristobulus, by raising a sedition one against the other; for now
we lost our liberty, and became subject to the Romans..." (Ant.
14.4.4; 77-78)? Is his pro-Roman and therefore anti-Hasmonean bias his
own or did he take it over from his sources? How would a historian with
an anti-Roman bias have interpreted these events?
4.4. Are you satisfied that
Josephus' accounts are an accurate reflection of Jewish political history
of this period? Are his accounts complete? If not, what
is missing?
Back
to Index Page
|