Hebrews 12:4-11
Suffering as Divine Discipline In Heb 12:4-11, the author explains the suffering of his readers as a result of God's discipline; thus they are to accept their difficult circumstances as from God because these are for their benefit. He begins by saying that the readers have not yet resisted sin to the point of blood, by which he means death. In other words, whatever afflictions they were suffering, no one had yet been martyred; to resist sin to the point of death is to resist the sin of apostasy even in the face of death. (The verb antagônizesthai [to resist] is a military term used to indicate the sin of apostasy is like an opponent that must be engaged in mortal combat [see Herod. 5.109; Thucid. 6.72.3. In 4 Macc 17:14, it is said of Antiochus, IV "The tyrant antêgônixeto; and the world and the life of men looked on.") The point of this observation is to exhort the readers to persevere, since Jesus (and the martyrs) had suffered more than they had (Heb 12:4). In Heb 12:5-6, the author then attempts to put their suffering in perspective by explaining that it is actually God's discipline imposed upon them, his children; to this end, he quotes from Prov 3:11-12. (The author's version differs from the LXX by having "my son" rather than "son.") When it is understood as divine discipline, the suffering of the readers becomes meaningful and therefore manageable. The idea of suffering being the means by which God disciplines a person, insofar as it serves to make a person righteous or to keep a person from becoming unrighteous, is a common idea in the second-Temple period. God uses suffering as discipline in response to actual or even potential sin. The same verse from Proverbs is either implied or quoted explicitly in other Jewish sources dealing with suffering as discipline (see Suffering as Divine Discipline).
In Heb 12:7-11, after exhorting his readers to endure discipline, the
author continues by interpreting the suffering of his readers as being
the manifestation of the love of God (The construction eis paideian
is a predicative accusative). In the same way that a loving father disciplines
his children, so God disciplines his own spiritual children. (The
readers are to "to endure" [hupomenein] disciple just
as Jesus "endured" the cross [Heb 12:2] and endured the hostility
of sinners [Heb 12:3].) The author argues from minor to major that, if
the readers submit to human discipline, how much more should they submit
to divine discipline (Heb 12:9). The term "father of the our
flesh" (tês sarkos hêmôn pateras) means
physical fathers; the genitive phrase "of the flesh" (tês
sarkos) is a descriptive genitive. By contrast, God is "the father
of spirits" (patêr tôn pneumatôn), by which
the author seems to mean that God is the creator of angels. (The phrase
"God of spirits and all flesh" [theos tôn pneumatôn
kai pasês sarkos] occurs in LXX Num 16:22; 27:16; "spirits"
in these two passages from Numbers probably refers to angels. Similarly,
in the Similitudes of Enoch [1 Enoch 37-71] God is called "Lord
of the Spirits [37:2-4; 38:4; 39:2, 7], and in 2 Macc 3:24 is called "the
sovereign of spirits and all authority" [ho tôn pneumatôn
kai pasês exousias dunastês]. In each case spirits mean
angels. In 1QH-a 18.8 God is called "prince of gods ['elim],"
meaning angels.) Yet there is no doubt that the author of Hebrews sees
"father of our flesh" and "father of spirits" as contrasting
terms, so that implied in his statement is the idea of God as "spiritual"
father, not only of angels, but also of believers. The author hopes that,
knowing this, his readers will be able to bear up under their sufferings.
Their suffering as divine discipline may not be pleasant during the time
when they are suffering, but later the benefit will become evident. The
author explicates the benefit of submitting to divine discipline in several
ways. First, he says that the result of divine discipline is
that the one so disciplined will live (zêsomen), by which
he means live in the sense used in the sapiential (wisdom) tradition,
either live a good quality of life on earth or live eternally. Second,
he says that the benefit of divine discipline is the sharing in God's
holiness (eis to metalabein tes hagiotêtos autou), by which
he means becoming practically holy, as God is. Third, in Heb
12:11, the author speaks of how the readers will receive the "peaceful
fruit of righteousness" (karpon eirenikon...dikaiosunes)
when they have allowed themselves to be trained through their suffering.
The "fruit" is the result of the experience of suffering, and it consists
of righteousness (genitive of content). In other words, suffering leads
to becoming more righteous in a practical sense, more in conformity with
the will of God. He also qualifies the "fruit" with the adjective "peaceful."
Peace has a wide range of meanings, but when used in a Jewish religious
context is often synonymous with salvation or God's blessings in general.
The "fruit" is peaceful because it is part of God's saving work, consisting
of the readers' transformation into the spiritually mature (teleioi)
(see Heb 5:11-14). It should be noted that the use of the verb gumnazein
("to train") represents the use of another athletic metaphor;
it communicates that the Christian life sometime involves intense and
systematic effort. Question for Discussion In your experience, how does God's discipline benefit the one placed under it?
Last Modified On:
|